Life’s “Progress”: Love Life Revisited
by Charles Willard
It is hardly surprising if your knowledge of Love Life is scant, because the afterlife of this show—that network of recordings, tours, stock productions that truly imprints most musicals on the public consciousness—simply never happened for Love Life.
Photo: Magician from the 1948 Broadway production
Love Life: An Overview along with Notes on Genesis and Production
by Joel Galand
Just what was it about Love Life that made it “experimental”? The authors subtitled Love Life unconventionally, not as a “musical comedy” or a “musical play” or even just “a new musical,” but as a “vaudeville.”
Photo: Kurt Weill and Alan Jay Lerner working on Love Life
An Interpretation of the Critical Response
by Bradley Rogers (University of Toronto Press, 2020)
When Love Life opened on Broadway in 1948, many critics felt that the musical theatre had reached new heights—with some going so far as to call the show “one of the most extraordinary productions in years, perhaps the most mature musical play the American stage has yet produced.”
Photo: “Green-Up Time” from the 2017 Theater Freiburg production
Weill’s Musical Theater: Stages of Reform
by Stephen Hinton (University of California Press, 2012)
Weill described Love Life as “a study of marriage in the last 100 years.” His description raises a question about the subtitle “A Vaudeville,” which sits uneasily with the notion of “a study,” as it was no doubt intended to. What are the precedents for this contradiction? Or are Weill and his collaborator Alan Jay Lerner establishing one?
Photo: “Locker Room” from the 1996 Opera North production
Love Life and Married Life in the 1940s
by Joel Galand
When audiences resist a work of art… it may be opening a window on some uncomfortable truths. The journal Theatre Arts dubbed Love Life “a Kinsey Report in a lace-paper binding.” That quip suggests that although its subject matter transcended the horizon of expectations for a musical play and was to that extent ahead of its time, Love Life was also timely.
Photo: Nanette Fabray from the 1948 Broadway production
Today’s Invention, Tomorrow’s Cliché: Love Life and the Concept Musical
by Kim H. Kowalke
Cabaret’s “concept” was to alternate narrative scenes containing traditional, non-diegetic “plot” numbers with diegetic “commentary” numbers. And indeed the non-linear structure of Cabaret is almost identical to that of Alan Jay Lerner and Kurt Weill’s Love Life.
Photo: Mayville setting from the 1948 Broadway production